top of page
Search
Olivia Maynes

Expanding Your Brand Worldwide: The Pros and Cons of Madrid Protocol Trademark Filings

The Madrid Protocol is an international treaty that streamlines the process of obtaining trademark protection across multiple countries through a single application.  Administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), this system allows trademark owners to secure rights in over 120 countries by filing one international application, rather than navigating the complexities of filing in each country individually. For businesses considering international expansion, the Madrid Protocol offers a potentially efficient path to broad trademark protection.  However, like any legal strategy, it comes with both advantages and potential pitfalls.


Understanding the Madrid Protocol


The Madrid Protocol simplifies international trademark registration by allowing an applicant to file a single application based on an existing or pending national trademark registration. In the United States, this application must be based on a registration or application filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Once filed, WIPO facilitates the application process, but it is essential to recognize that each designated country independently assesses the application based on its national laws. This decentralized evaluation process can lead to unique challenges, including the need for amendments or additional submissions tailored to individual jurisdictions.


Potential Benefits of Madrid Protocol Filings


  1. Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness: Filing through the Madrid Protocol can initially appear more cost-effective compared to filing individual applications in each jurisdiction. The system allows for a single set of fees paid in one currency, reducing the financial and administrative burden of handling multiple applications across various countries. However, it is crucial to be aware that the cost-efficiency may diminish over time, particularly if substantial amendments are required by severalspecific jurisdictions.  Moreover, bypassing the Madrid Protocol and utilizing a foreign counsel in each designated countrycountry to file provides country-specific advice from a licensed foreign attorney as well as possible infringement monitoring and docketing redundancies.

  2. Centralized Management: The Madrid Protocol offers the advantage of centralized management of trademark portfolios. This includes the ability to easily update changes in ownership, address, or name across all jurisdictions covered by the international registration. Such a centralized approach streamlines the maintenance of a global trademark portfolio, reducing administrative complexity and ensuring consistent protection across multiple regions.  However, centralized management also causes a hub and spoke issue.  For example, if the US “hub” application is refused entirely for a substantive issue, e.g., a confusingly similar trademark, and the US application abandons, the “spoke” international applications must be converted to individual country applications or they will also abandon (see Dependency Clause, below).

  3. Subsequent Designation Flexibility: As a company grows and its market presence expands, the Madrid Protocol allows for the addition of new countries. This flexibility enables businesses to adapt their trademark protection strategy in response to evolving market conditions and geographic expansion.  


The Dependency Clause: A Critical Consideration


One of the most significant aspects of the Madrid Protocol is the Dependency Clause, which ties the international registrations to the basic national application or registration for the first five years. This means that if the original national application or registration faces any challenges, such as a cancellation or opposition, the international registrations are is also vulnerable to being impacted—a scenario known as a "central attack." This inherent risk underscores the importance of careful strategic planning when utilizing the Madrid Protocol, as the consequences of a central attack can extend beyond a single jurisdiction, potentially affecting trademark rights on a global scale.


Is the Madrid Protocol Right for Your Business?


Deciding whether to pursue international trademark protection through the Madrid Protocol requires a thorough analysis of your company's long-term business objectives, risk tolerance, and available resources. While the benefits of a streamlined application process and centralized management are compelling, these must be balanced against the risks associated with the Dependency Clause and the potential for increased costs due to jurisdiction-specific amendments. Engaging with experienced trademark attorneys is essential to navigate these complexities and to develop a tailored strategy that aligns with your business goals and minimizes potential risks.


For further guidance on whether the Madrid Protocol is the right choice for your international trademark strategy, consulting with our team can provide the insights and expertise necessary to make informed decisions. Email: scott@sisunlaw.com for more information.

27 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Commentaires


bottom of page